Page views
15
7d
▼ 17% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
3.44 s
60% good · 15 samples
▲ 106% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
182 ms
88% good · 8 samples
▼ 49% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
87% good · 15 samples
▼ 10% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
2.44 s
53% good · 15 samples
▲ 82% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
1.59 s
53% good · 15 samples
▲ 191% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
53%
7% unhappy · 15 rated
What to fix first
/articles/* pages are slow to show their main content
p75 LCP is 3.44 s over 15 full page loads; 7% took over 4 s. Most of the time goes on waiting for the server.
Try: Most of the time passes before the HTML arrives: cache pages at the edge/CDN or speed up the server.
LCP by page and element →
Based on 15 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 9 | 3.52 s | 250 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 5 | 1.17 s | 169 ms | 0.04 |
| Tablet | 1 | 8.87 s | 27 ms | 0.12 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 9 | 1.89 | 40.4 s | 56% |
| Needs improvement | 5 | 0.80 | 24.3 s | 60% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 5.8 s | 47% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB | 545 ms | 1.59 s | ▲ 191% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 417 ms | 1.19 s | ▲ 186% |
| p75 LCP | 1.67 s | 3.44 s | ▲ 106% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 251 ms | 481 ms | ▲ 92% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 40 ms | 76 ms | ▲ 88% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 677 ms | 1.25 s | ▲ 84% |
| p75 FCP | 1.34 s | 2.44 s | ▲ 82% |
| p75 INP | 360 ms | 182 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 90 ms | 46 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 162 ms | 82 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 108 ms | 55 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 522 ms | 739 ms | ▲ 41% |