ClickVitals /Shop & magazine (demo) Log in Sign up
Clear filters
Page views
449
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.01 s
85% good · 449 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
135 ms
86% good · 289 samples
▼ 12% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
88% good · 449 samples
▼ 20% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.98 s
70% good · 449 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
1.08 s
61% good · 449 samples
▼ 3% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
69%
8% unhappy · 449 rated

12% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.

What to fix first

Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 44% less engaged time and 74% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 24 slow page views across 1 page type.
Compare fast and slow page views →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 45 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 47 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 45 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 2.01 s, INP 135 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →

Trend

By device

DevicePage viewsp75 LCPp75 INPp75 CLS
Mobile562 2.68 s 282 ms 0.03
Desktop449 2.01 s 135 ms 0.04
Tablet162 2.88 s 256 ms 0.03

Does speed cost engagement?

Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.

LCPPage viewsClicks per viewEngaged timeAvg scroll
Good3801.77 34.0 s55%
Needs improvement450.76 25.7 s65%
Poor240.46 19.0 s37%

Biggest changes vs previous 7d

MeasurePreviousNowChange
p75 INP153 ms135 ms ▼ 12%
Avg engaged time29.9 s32.3 s ▲ 8%
p75 LCP · Render delay952 ms924 ms ▼ 3%
p75 TTFB · Server wait929 ms903 ms ▼ 3%
p75 TTFB1.11 s1.08 s ▼ 3%