Page views
4.5k
7d
▼ 2% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.54 s
90% good · 4.5k samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
148 ms
85% good · 2.9k samples
▲ 2% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
89% good · 4.5k samples
▼ 9% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.30 s
87% good · 4.5k samples
▲ 1% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
703 ms
80% good · 4.5k samples
± 0% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
73%
8% unhappy · 4.5k rated
10% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 52% less engaged time and 79% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 184 slow page views across 5 page types.
Compare fast and slow page views →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 457 page views where it shifted, mostly on /.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 459 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 422 page views where it shifted, mostly on /. 1 more element that shifts is in the Vitals tab.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.54 s, INP 148 ms, CLS 0.03: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 6.0k | 2.16 s | 268 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 4.5k | 1.54 s | 148 ms | 0.03 |
| Tablet | 1.5k | 2.20 s | 260 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 4.0k | 1.70 | 34.3 s | 57% |
| Needs improvement | 264 | 0.89 | 22.9 s | 58% |
| Poor | 184 | 0.36 | 16.5 s | 40% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 376 ms | 392 ms | ▲ 4% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 553 ms | 536 ms | ▼ 3% |