ClickVitals /Shop & magazine (demo) Log in Sign up
Clear filters
Page views
35
7d
▼ 12% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.50 s
100% good · 35 samples
▲ 10% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
135 ms
86% good · 22 samples
▼ 35% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
94% good · 35 samples
▼ 70% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.15 s
94% good · 35 samples
▲ 8% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
587 ms
94% good · 35 samples
▲ 3% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
89%
3% unhappy · 35 rated

What to fix first

Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.related-articles > a
p75 INP is 221 ms over 3 page views, mostly on /articles/4/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.50 s, INP 135 ms, CLS 0.02: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →

Based on 35 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).

Trend

By device

DevicePage viewsp75 LCPp75 INPp75 CLS
Mobile46 1.81 s 283 ms 0.03
Desktop35 1.50 s 135 ms 0.02
Tablet6 1.50 s 130 ms 0.00

Does speed cost engagement?

Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.

LCPPage viewsClicks per viewEngaged timeAvg scroll
Good351.91 36.1 s52%

Biggest changes vs previous 7d

MeasurePreviousNowChange
p75 CLS0.070.02 ▼ 70%
p75 INP206 ms135 ms ▼ 35%
p75 INP · Input delay52 ms34 ms ▼ 35%
p75 INP · Processing93 ms61 ms ▼ 35%
p75 INP · Presentation62 ms40 ms ▼ 35%
p75 TTFB · Connect32 ms21 ms ▼ 34%
p75 LCP · Load delay294 ms379 ms ▲ 29%
p75 LCP · Render delay311 ms225 ms ▼ 28%
p75 LCP · Load time580 ms708 ms ▲ 22%
p75 HTML download69 ms83 ms ▲ 21%
Avg engaged time32.3 s36.1 s ▲ 12%
p75 TTFB · Server wait462 ms509 ms ▲ 10%