Page views
12
7d
▲ 9% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.55 s
100% good · 12 samples
▼ 14% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
79 ms
100% good · 10 samples
▼ 45% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.11
67% good · 12 samples
FCP · p75
1.21 s
100% good · 12 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
568 ms
92% good · 12 samples
▲ 1% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
67%
0% unhappy · 12 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 12 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 21 | 1.87 s | 267 ms | 0.05 |
| Desktop | 12 | 1.55 s | 79 ms | 0.11 |
| Tablet | 5 | 1.74 s | 528 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 12 | 1.92 | 36.4 s | 50% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 50 ms | 424 ms | ▲ 742% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 43 ms | 24 ms | ▼ 45% |
| p75 INP | 142 ms | 79 ms | ▼ 45% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 35 ms | 20 ms | ▼ 45% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 64 ms | 35 ms | ▼ 45% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 408 ms | 529 ms | ▲ 30% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 74 ms | 56 ms | ▼ 24% |
| Avg engaged time | 30.2 s | 36.4 s | ▲ 21% |
| p75 LCP | 1.81 s | 1.55 s | ▼ 14% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 513 ms | 449 ms | ▼ 12% |
| Avg scroll depth | 57% | 50% | ▼ 11% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 490 ms | 510 ms | ▲ 4% |