Page views
21
7d
▲ 11% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.59 s
81% good · 21 samples
▲ 34% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
81 ms
93% good · 15 samples
▼ 50% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
90% good · 21 samples
▲ 55% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.25 s
90% good · 21 samples
▲ 30% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
616 ms
86% good · 21 samples
▲ 11% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
71%
10% unhappy · 21 rated
What to fix first
CLS got 55% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.02. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
LCP got 34% worse than the previous 7d
p75 LCP is now 1.59 s. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
LCP over time →
Based on 21 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 27 | 2.52 s | 364 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 21 | 1.59 s | 81 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 9 | 1.55 s | 493 ms | 0.05 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 17 | 1.59 | 42.0 s | 57% |
| Needs improvement | 2 | 0.50 | 32.6 s | 82% |
| Poor | 2 | 1.00 | 7.6 s | 42% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load time | 350 ms | 681 ms | ▲ 95% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 333 ms | 66 ms | ▼ 80% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 73 ms | 37 ms | ▼ 50% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 49 ms | 24 ms | ▼ 50% |
| p75 INP | 163 ms | 81 ms | ▼ 50% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 41 ms | 20 ms | ▼ 50% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 52 ms | 33 ms | ▼ 37% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 488 ms | 321 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 LCP | 1.19 s | 1.59 s | ▲ 34% |
| p75 HTML download | 72 ms | 95 ms | ▲ 32% |
| p75 FCP | 964 ms | 1.25 s | ▲ 30% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 507 ms | 616 ms | ▲ 22% |