Page views
442
7d
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.02 s
84% good · 442 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
135 ms
86% good · 284 samples
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
88% good · 442 samples
▼ 19% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.99 s
70% good · 442 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
1.08 s
61% good · 442 samples
▼ 3% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
69%
8% unhappy · 442 rated
12% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 44% less engaged time and 74% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 24 slow page views across 1 page type.
Compare fast and slow page views →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 44 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 45 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 45 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 2.02 s, INP 135 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 548 | 2.69 s | 284 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 442 | 2.02 s | 135 ms | 0.04 |
| Tablet | 160 | 2.89 s | 253 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 373 | 1.77 | 33.7 s | 55% |
| Needs improvement | 45 | 0.76 | 25.7 s | 65% |
| Poor | 24 | 0.46 | 19.0 s | 37% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP | 153 ms | 135 ms | ▼ 11% |
| Avg engaged time | 30.1 s | 32.1 s | ▲ 7% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 952 ms | 924 ms | ▼ 3% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.11 s | 1.08 s | ▼ 3% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 934 ms | 915 ms | ▼ 2% |