Page views
408
7d
▼ 17% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.19 s
94% good · 408 samples
▼ 4% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
160 ms
82% good · 262 samples
▲ 7% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.06
80% good · 408 samples
▼ 24% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.17 s
90% good · 408 samples
▼ 4% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
653 ms
83% good · 408 samples
▼ 2% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
69%
13% unhappy · 408 rated
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 29% less engaged time and 75% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 10 slow page views across 1 page type.
Compare fast and slow page views →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.29 on the 36 page views where it shifted, mostly on /c/pc-builds/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.25 on the 39 page views where it shifted, mostly on /c/headsets/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.26 on the 35 page views where it shifted, mostly on /c/mice/. 1 more element that shifts is in the Vitals tab.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.19 s, INP 160 ms, CLS 0.06: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 576 | 1.60 s | 249 ms | 0.08 |
| Desktop | 408 | 1.19 s | 160 ms | 0.06 |
| Tablet | 124 | 1.71 s | 263 ms | 0.07 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 385 | 1.61 | 31.9 s | 56% |
| Needs improvement | 13 | 0.77 | 24.3 s | 51% |
| Poor | 10 | 0.40 | 22.6 s | 33% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.08 | 0.06 | ▼ 24% |
| Avg engaged time | 36.2 s | 31.5 s | ▼ 13% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 579 ms | 530 ms | ▼ 8% |
| p75 FCP | 1.22 s | 1.17 s | ▼ 4% |
| p75 LCP | 1.24 s | 1.19 s | ▼ 4% |
| Avg scroll depth | 57% | 56% | ▼ 3% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 540 ms | 553 ms | ▲ 2% |