Page views
25
7d
▼ 52% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.66 s
92% good · 25 samples
▼ 8% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
208 ms
74% good · 19 samples
▲ 50% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.07
88% good · 25 samples
▲ 542% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.17 s
88% good · 25 samples
▼ 14% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
687 ms
80% good · 25 samples
▼ 20% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
64%
8% unhappy · 25 rated
20% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
button.add-to-cart
p75 INP is 552 ms over 3 page views, mostly on /articles/7/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
CLS got 542% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.07. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
#onetrust-accept-btn-handler
p75 INP is 283 ms over 5 page views, mostly on /articles/7/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.25 on the 6 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/7/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Based on 25 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 25 | 2.05 s | 267 ms | 0.04 |
| Desktop | 25 | 1.66 s | 208 ms | 0.07 |
| Tablet | 11 | 1.39 s | 163 ms | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 23 | 1.57 | 30.5 s | 66% |
| Needs improvement | 2 | 1.50 | 40.5 s | 32% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.01 | 0.07 | ▲ 542% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 196 ms | 67 ms | ▼ 66% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 42 ms | 63 ms | ▲ 50% |
| p75 INP | 139 ms | 208 ms | ▲ 50% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 35 ms | 52 ms | ▲ 50% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 63 ms | 94 ms | ▲ 50% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 43 ms | 29 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 757 ms | 573 ms | ▼ 24% |
| p75 TTFB | 853 ms | 687 ms | ▼ 20% |
| p75 FCP | 1.35 s | 1.17 s | ▼ 14% |
| Avg scroll depth | 57% | 63% | ▲ 11% |
| Avg engaged time | 34.9 s | 31.3 s | ▼ 10% |