Page views
38
7d
▼ 16% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.59 s
95% good · 38 samples
▲ 14% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
143 ms
88% good · 25 samples
▼ 36% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
95% good · 38 samples
▼ 73% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.17 s
92% good · 38 samples
▲ 8% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
597 ms
92% good · 38 samples
▲ 4% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
84%
3% unhappy · 38 rated
What to fix first
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.59 s, INP 143 ms, CLS 0.02: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Based on 38 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 57 | 2.21 s | 268 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 38 | 1.59 s | 143 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 12 | 3.26 s | 130 ms | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 36 | 1.97 | 35.3 s | 52% |
| Needs improvement | 2 | 1.00 | 61.4 s | 78% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.06 | 0.02 | ▼ 73% |
| p75 INP | 222 ms | 143 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 56 ms | 36 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 100 ms | 64 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 67 ms | 43 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 32 ms | 21 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 301 ms | 217 ms | ▼ 28% |
| p75 HTML download | 68 ms | 85 ms | ▲ 26% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 49 ms | 37 ms | ▼ 24% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 309 ms | 379 ms | ▲ 23% |
| Avg engaged time | 31.3 s | 36.7 s | ▲ 17% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 613 ms | 708 ms | ▲ 16% |