Page views
13
7d
▲ 1200% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.35 s
85% good · 13 samples
▼ 37% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
166 ms
82% good · 11 samples
▲ 92% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.00
85% good · 13 samples
FCP · p75
1.01 s
85% good · 13 samples
▼ 32% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
641 ms
85% good · 13 samples
▲ 3103% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
69%
8% unhappy · 13 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 13 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 7 | 1.15 s | 169 ms | 0.00 |
| Mobile | 5 | 2.82 s | 163 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.35 s | 23 ms | 0.15 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 11 | 1.82 | 12.2 s | 67% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 0.8 s | 100% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 28.1 s | 14% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB | 20 ms | 641 ms | ▲ 3103% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 20 ms | 532 ms | ▲ 2560% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 24 ms | 64 ms | ▲ 164% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 26 ms | 50 ms | ▲ 92% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 39 ms | 75 ms | ▲ 92% |
| p75 INP | 86 ms | 166 ms | ▲ 92% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 22 ms | 42 ms | ▲ 92% |
| p75 HTML download | 312 ms | 98 ms | ▼ 69% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 1.13 s | 374 ms | ▼ 67% |
| Avg engaged time | 32.7 s | 12.5 s | ▼ 62% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 958 ms | 428 ms | ▼ 55% |
| p75 LCP | 2.13 s | 1.35 s | ▼ 37% |