Page views
24
7d
▼ 35% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.25 s
96% good · 24 samples
▼ 25% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
144 ms
87% good · 15 samples
▼ 42% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
92% good · 24 samples
▼ 2% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.24 s
88% good · 24 samples
▼ 24% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
671 ms
83% good · 24 samples
▼ 27% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
79%
8% unhappy · 24 rated
13% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 24 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 12 | 1.27 s | 145 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 8 | 1.24 s | 78 ms | 0.01 |
| Tablet | 4 | 1.34 s | 82 ms | 0.06 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 23 | 1.91 | 39.5 s | 67% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 1.00 | 13.1 s | 73% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 43 ms | 2 ms | ▼ 94% |
| Avg engaged time | 24.3 s | 38.4 s | ▲ 58% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 74 ms | 43 ms | ▼ 42% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 111 ms | 65 ms | ▼ 42% |
| p75 INP | 246 ms | 144 ms | ▼ 42% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 61 ms | 36 ms | ▼ 42% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 102 ms | 63 ms | ▼ 38% |
| Avg scroll depth | 50% | 67% | ▲ 33% |
| p75 TTFB | 917 ms | 671 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 LCP | 1.67 s | 1.25 s | ▼ 25% |
| p75 FCP | 1.64 s | 1.24 s | ▼ 24% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 650 ms | 497 ms | ▼ 24% |