Page views
7
7d
▲ 133% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.71 s
86% good · 7 samples
▲ 84% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
154 ms
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 79% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.05
86% good · 7 samples
▼ 62% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.09 s
86% good · 7 samples
▲ 139% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
625 ms
86% good · 7 samples
▲ 109% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
71%
14% unhappy · 7 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 7 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 4 | 2.54 s | 150 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 3 | 1.46 s | 136 ms | 0.07 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 6 | 0.83 | 27.4 s | 50% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 9.3 s | 25% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 183 ms | 1.64 s | ▲ 796% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 63 ms | 408 ms | ▲ 547% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 26 ms | 68 ms | ▲ 158% |
| p75 FCP | 458 ms | 1.09 s | ▲ 139% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 242 ms | 507 ms | ▲ 110% |
| p75 TTFB | 299 ms | 625 ms | ▲ 109% |
| p75 LCP | 927 ms | 1.71 s | ▲ 84% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 216 ms | 46 ms | ▼ 79% |
| p75 INP | 720 ms | 154 ms | ▼ 79% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 180 ms | 38 ms | ▼ 79% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 324 ms | 69 ms | ▼ 79% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 30 ms | 50 ms | ▲ 65% |