Page views
6
7d
▼ 62% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.74 s
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 14% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
426 ms
33% good · 3 samples
▲ 69% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 63% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
792 ms
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 53% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
423 ms
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 53% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
67%
0% unhappy · 6 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 6 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet | 3 | 2.17 s | 442 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 3 | 875 ms | 46 ms | 0.06 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 6 | 1.83 | 33.3 s | 59% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load time | 429 ms | 1.27 s | ▲ 197% |
| Avg engaged time | 17.4 s | 33.3 s | ▲ 91% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 381 ms | 59 ms | ▼ 85% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 114 ms | 192 ms | ▲ 69% |
| p75 INP | 253 ms | 426 ms | ▲ 69% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 63 ms | 107 ms | ▲ 69% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 76 ms | 128 ms | ▲ 69% |
| p75 CLS | 0.08 | 0.03 | ▼ 63% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 641 ms | 278 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 722 ms | 314 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 TTFB | 907 ms | 423 ms | ▼ 53% |
| p75 FCP | 1.67 s | 792 ms | ▼ 53% |