Page views
10
7d
▼ 38% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
982 ms
100% good · 10 samples
▼ 34% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
106 ms
83% good · 6 samples
▼ 29% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
80% good · 10 samples
▼ 58% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
955 ms
100% good · 10 samples
▼ 35% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
517 ms
90% good · 10 samples
▼ 38% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
70%
0% unhappy · 10 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 10 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 6 | 954 ms | 70 ms | 0.03 |
| Mobile | 4 | 1.11 s | 314 ms | 0.05 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 10 | 2.30 | 18.3 s | 62% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 84 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 CLS | 0.08 | 0.03 | ▼ 58% |
| Avg engaged time | 32.3 s | 18.3 s | ▼ 43% |
| p75 TTFB | 836 ms | 517 ms | ▼ 38% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 620 ms | 390 ms | ▼ 37% |
| p75 FCP | 1.47 s | 955 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 LCP | 1.49 s | 982 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 INP | 150 ms | 106 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 37 ms | 26 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 67 ms | 48 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 45 ms | 32 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 90 ms | 64 ms | ▼ 29% |