Page views
5
7d
▲ 25% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.28 s
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 5% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
122 ms
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 52% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.11 s
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 15% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
660 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 18% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 5 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 5 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 3 | 1.08 s | 117 ms | 0.01 |
| Mobile | 2 | 1.60 s | 116 ms | 0.05 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 5 | 2.60 | 34.2 s | 53% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 99 ms | 280 ms | ▲ 183% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 270 ms | 551 ms | ▲ 104% |
| p75 TTFB · Redirect & other | 16 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 CLS | 0.04 | 0.02 | ▼ 52% |
| p75 HTML download | 92 ms | 71 ms | ▼ 23% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 92 ms | 71 ms | ▼ 22% |
| Avg engaged time | 43.0 s | 34.2 s | ▼ 21% |
| p75 TTFB | 800 ms | 660 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 FCP | 1.30 s | 1.11 s | ▼ 15% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 617 ms | 536 ms | ▼ 13% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 521 ms | 465 ms | ▼ 11% |
| p75 INP | 136 ms | 122 ms | ▼ 11% |