Page views
398
7d
▼ 8% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.96 s
82% good · 398 samples
▲ 14% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
203 ms
74% good · 249 samples
▲ 3% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
93% good · 398 samples
▼ 30% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.58 s
82% good · 398 samples
▲ 13% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
860 ms
71% good · 398 samples
▲ 13% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
63%
14% unhappy · 398 rated
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 63% less engaged time and 78% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 36 slow page views across 1 page type.
Compare fast and slow page views →
Tablet visitors get a much slower INP
p75 INP is 255 ms on tablet against 147 ms on desktop. Tablet is 16% of your page views.
Try: Test on a real mid-range phone or with CPU throttling: big images, heavy JavaScript and third-party scripts cost far more there.
INP by device →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
nav.toc > a.toc-link
p75 INP is 260 ms over 33 page views, mostly on /articles/102/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
button.menu-toggle
p75 INP is 260 ms over 24 page views, mostly on /articles/0/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.related-articles > a
p75 INP is 202 ms over 24 page views, mostly on /articles/104/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 193 | 2.12 s | 209 ms | 0.03 |
| Desktop | 143 | 1.55 s | 147 ms | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 62 | 2.28 s | 255 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 328 | 1.64 | 36.6 s | 59% |
| Needs improvement | 34 | 0.71 | 23.3 s | 56% |
| Poor | 36 | 0.36 | 13.5 s | 37% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.04 | 0.02 | ▼ 30% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 79 ms | 95 ms | ▲ 20% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 78 ms | 88 ms | ▲ 14% |
| p75 LCP | 1.72 s | 1.96 s | ▲ 14% |
| p75 TTFB | 758 ms | 860 ms | ▲ 13% |
| p75 FCP | 1.40 s | 1.58 s | ▲ 13% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 622 ms | 695 ms | ▲ 12% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 551 ms | 611 ms | ▲ 11% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 276 ms | 253 ms | ▼ 8% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 592 ms | 617 ms | ▲ 4% |
| Avg engaged time | 32.4 s | 33.4 s | ▲ 3% |