Page views
2
7d
LCP · p75
3.22 s
50% good · 2 samples
INP · p75
121 ms
100% good · 2 samples
CLS · p75
0.03
100% good · 2 samples
FCP · p75
2.11 s
50% good · 2 samples
TTFB · p75
1.33 s
50% good · 2 samples
Happy page views
50%
0% unhappy · 2 rated
50% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 2 | 3.85 s | 127 ms | 0.01 |
| Desktop | 2 | 3.22 s | 121 ms | 0.03 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.47 s | 172 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1 | 1.00 | 6.9 s | 24% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 1.00 | 9.1 s | 10% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| No page views in the previous 7d to compare against yet. | |||