Page views
17
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.14 s
94% good · 17 samples
▼ 35% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
194 ms
75% good · 12 samples
▲ 9% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.01
100% good · 17 samples
▼ 87% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
969 ms
88% good · 17 samples
▼ 16% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
528 ms
88% good · 17 samples
▼ 27% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
76%
0% unhappy · 17 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 17 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 10 | 946 ms | 174 ms | 0.00 |
| Mobile | 6 | 1.97 s | 189 ms | 0.01 |
| Tablet | 1 | 451 ms | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 16 | 2.00 | 37.1 s | 58% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 5.1 s | 46% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.01 | ▼ 87% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 1.05 s | 406 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 54 ms | 23 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 769 ms | 326 ms | ▼ 58% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 52 ms | 29 ms | ▼ 45% |
| p75 LCP | 1.76 s | 1.14 s | ▼ 35% |
| Avg scroll depth | 43% | 58% | ▲ 33% |
| Avg engaged time | 50.4 s | 35.2 s | ▼ 30% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 393 ms | 274 ms | ▼ 30% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 614 ms | 433 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 TTFB | 727 ms | 528 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 FCP | 1.16 s | 969 ms | ▼ 16% |