Page views
8
7d
▲ 33% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.82 s
100% good · 8 samples
▲ 38% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
189 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 8 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.48 s
100% good · 8 samples
▲ 17% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
868 ms
63% good · 8 samples
▲ 9% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
88%
0% unhappy · 8 rated
25% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 8 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 5 | 1.87 s | 222 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 2 | 649 ms | – | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.16 s | 189 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 8 | 2.13 | 44.5 s | 50% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load time | 227 ms | 545 ms | ▲ 141% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 50 ms | 80 ms | ▲ 61% |
| p75 LCP | 1.32 s | 1.82 s | ▲ 38% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 555 ms | 754 ms | ▲ 36% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 62 ms | 83 ms | ▲ 34% |
| Avg engaged time | 55.9 s | 44.5 s | ▼ 20% |
| p75 FCP | 1.26 s | 1.48 s | ▲ 17% |
| p75 TTFB | 794 ms | 868 ms | ▲ 9% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 414 ms | 384 ms | ▼ 7% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 659 ms | 693 ms | ▲ 5% |
| Avg scroll depth | 48% | 50% | ▲ 5% |