Page views
7
7d
▲ 250% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.04 s
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 34% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
160 ms
67% good · 3 samples
CLS · p75
0.01
86% good · 7 samples
▼ 71% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
691 ms
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 34% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
320 ms
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 25% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
71%
0% unhappy · 7 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 7 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 7 | 1.04 s | 160 ms | 0.01 |
| Mobile | 6 | 2.07 s | 215 ms | 0.03 |
| Tablet | 3 | 2.38 s | 448 ms | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 7 | 1.57 | 42.5 s | 53% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 61 ms | 241 ms | ▲ 293% |
| Avg engaged time | 12.7 s | 42.5 s | ▲ 235% |
| p75 CLS | 0.04 | 0.01 | ▼ 71% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 729 ms | 465 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 FCP | 1.05 s | 691 ms | ▼ 34% |
| p75 LCP | 1.57 s | 1.04 s | ▼ 34% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 426 ms | 305 ms | ▼ 28% |
| p75 TTFB | 426 ms | 320 ms | ▼ 25% |
| p75 HTML download | 71 ms | 88 ms | ▲ 24% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 362 ms | 332 ms | ▼ 8% |
| Avg scroll depth | 58% | 53% | ▼ 8% |