Page views
11
7d
▲ 38% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.57 s
91% good · 11 samples
▲ 88% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
76 ms
88% good · 8 samples
▼ 61% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
100% good · 11 samples
▲ 33% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.30 s
91% good · 11 samples
▲ 113% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
768 ms
82% good · 11 samples
▲ 148% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
82%
0% unhappy · 11 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 11 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 11 | 1.57 s | 76 ms | 0.02 |
| Mobile | 7 | 2.42 s | 144 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 2 | 1.33 s | 53 ms | 0.01 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 10 | 1.90 | 27.0 s | 48% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 13.4 s | 53% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 27 ms | 83 ms | ▲ 211% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 168 ms | 458 ms | ▲ 173% |
| p75 TTFB | 310 ms | 768 ms | ▲ 148% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 272 ms | 664 ms | ▲ 144% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 21 ms | 48 ms | ▲ 126% |
| p75 FCP | 610 ms | 1.30 s | ▲ 113% |
| p75 LCP | 837 ms | 1.57 s | ▲ 88% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 296 ms | 64 ms | ▼ 78% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 59 ms | 23 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 INP | 197 ms | 76 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 49 ms | 19 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 89 ms | 34 ms | ▼ 61% |