ClickVitals /Shop & magazine (demo) Log in Sign up
Clear filters
Page views
19
7d
▲ 19% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.35 s
89% good · 19 samples
▼ 3% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
235 ms
71% good · 14 samples
▲ 179% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
79% good · 19 samples
▼ 12% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.07 s
89% good · 19 samples
▲ 28% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
546 ms
79% good · 19 samples
▲ 17% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
58%
5% unhappy · 19 rated

11% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.

What to fix first

Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
#onetrust-accept-btn-handler
p75 INP is 253 ms over 4 page views, mostly on /articles/1/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →

Based on 19 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).

Trend

By device

DevicePage viewsp75 LCPp75 INPp75 CLS
Desktop19 1.35 s 235 ms 0.04
Mobile18 1.93 s 446 ms 0.04
Tablet4 2.39 s 131 ms 0.02

Does speed cost engagement?

Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.

LCPPage viewsClicks per viewEngaged timeAvg scroll
Good171.65 31.8 s57%
Needs improvement11.00 49.0 s22%
Poor11.00 19.2 s46%

Biggest changes vs previous 7d

MeasurePreviousNowChange
p75 LCP · Render delay70 ms272 ms ▲ 290%
p75 INP84 ms235 ms ▲ 179%
p75 INP · Input delay21 ms59 ms ▲ 179%
p75 INP · Processing38 ms106 ms ▲ 179%
p75 INP · Presentation25 ms71 ms ▲ 179%
p75 LCP · Load time360 ms678 ms ▲ 89%
p75 HTML download68 ms92 ms ▲ 35%
p75 LCP · Load delay249 ms328 ms ▲ 32%
p75 TTFB · Server wait416 ms543 ms ▲ 31%
p75 FCP838 ms1.07 s ▲ 28%
Avg scroll depth45%55% ▲ 21%
p75 TTFB467 ms546 ms ▲ 17%