Page views
13
7d
▼ 41% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.73 s
77% good · 13 samples
▼ 21% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
253 ms
56% good · 9 samples
▲ 66% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 13 samples
▼ 85% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
921 ms
85% good · 13 samples
▼ 39% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
481 ms
85% good · 13 samples
▼ 49% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
54%
8% unhappy · 13 rated
15% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 13 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 8 | 2.20 s | 318 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 5 | 1.40 s | 96 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 10 | 1.90 | 29.3 s | 60% |
| Needs improvement | 2 | 1.00 | 23.9 s | 74% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 4.4 s | 45% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.02 | 0.00 | ▼ 85% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 46 ms | 76 ms | ▲ 66% |
| p75 INP | 153 ms | 253 ms | ▲ 66% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 38 ms | 63 ms | ▲ 66% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 69 ms | 114 ms | ▲ 66% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 682 ms | 324 ms | ▼ 53% |
| p75 TTFB | 940 ms | 481 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 59 ms | 33 ms | ▼ 44% |
| Avg engaged time | 46.8 s | 26.6 s | ▼ 43% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 771 ms | 1.08 s | ▲ 41% |
| p75 FCP | 1.51 s | 921 ms | ▼ 39% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 53 ms | 33 ms | ▼ 37% |