Page views
12
7d
▼ 33% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
3.26 s
67% good · 12 samples
▲ 56% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
161 ms
83% good · 6 samples
▲ 4% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 12 samples
▼ 86% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
2.21 s
58% good · 12 samples
▲ 95% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
1.14 s
42% good · 12 samples
▲ 60% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
58%
25% unhappy · 12 rated
What to fix first
/articles/* pages are slow to show their main content
p75 LCP is 3.26 s over 12 full page loads; 25% took over 4 s. Most of the time goes on waiting for the server.
Try: Most of the time passes before the HTML arrives: cache pages at the edge/CDN or speed up the server.
LCP by page and element →
Based on 12 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 6 | 3.84 s | 189 ms | 0.03 |
| Mobile | 5 | 1.99 s | 130 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 1 | 2.79 s | 160 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 8 | 1.50 | 28.1 s | 51% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 1.00 | 19.5 s | 13% |
| Poor | 3 | 0.33 | 17.3 s | 53% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 222 ms | 603 ms | ▲ 171% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 439 ms | 910 ms | ▲ 107% |
| p75 FCP | 1.13 s | 2.21 s | ▲ 95% |
| p75 CLS | 0.03 | 0.00 | ▼ 86% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 45 ms | 10 ms | ▼ 78% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 39 ms | 9 ms | ▼ 78% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 656 ms | 1.07 s | ▲ 63% |
| p75 TTFB | 710 ms | 1.14 s | ▲ 60% |
| p75 LCP | 2.09 s | 3.26 s | ▲ 56% |
| Avg engaged time | 33.8 s | 24.7 s | ▼ 27% |
| Avg scroll depth | 55% | 48% | ▼ 12% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 622 ms | 647 ms | ▲ 4% |