Page views
15
7d
▲ 36% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.87 s
87% good · 15 samples
▲ 61% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
234 ms
58% good · 12 samples
▼ 49% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
100% good · 15 samples
▲ 171% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
963 ms
87% good · 15 samples
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
550 ms
80% good · 15 samples
▼ 8% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
60%
0% unhappy · 15 rated
What to fix first
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
button.menu-toggle
p75 INP is 271 ms over 4 page views, mostly on /articles/10/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
Based on 15 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 8 | 1.30 s | 317 ms | 0.04 |
| Desktop | 5 | 1.56 s | 127 ms | 0.09 |
| Tablet | 2 | 2.24 s | 100 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 13 | 1.38 | 29.3 s | 58% |
| Needs improvement | 2 | 0.50 | 20.4 s | 70% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.02 | 0.04 | ▲ 171% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 211 ms | 558 ms | ▲ 165% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 35 ms | 8 ms | ▼ 78% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 35 ms | 11 ms | ▼ 69% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 332 ms | 546 ms | ▲ 64% |
| p75 LCP | 1.16 s | 1.87 s | ▲ 61% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 137 ms | 70 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 206 ms | 105 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP | 457 ms | 234 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 114 ms | 59 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 405 ms | 213 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 HTML download | 74 ms | 96 ms | ▲ 30% |