ClickVitals /Shop & magazine (demo) Log in Sign up
Clear filters
Page views
17
7d
▲ 21% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.17 s
76% good · 17 samples
▲ 31% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
243 ms
56% good · 9 samples
▲ 38% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
94% good · 17 samples
▼ 44% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.55 s
76% good · 17 samples
▲ 52% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
783 ms
76% good · 17 samples
▲ 31% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
59%
12% unhappy · 17 rated

18% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.

What to fix first

Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
#onetrust-accept-btn-handler
p75 INP is 514 ms over 3 page views, mostly on /articles/10/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →

Based on 17 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).

Trend

By device

DevicePage viewsp75 LCPp75 INPp75 CLS
Mobile8 2.72 s 384 ms 0.02
Desktop6 751 ms 141 ms 0.00
Tablet3 3.46 s 309 ms 0.04

Does speed cost engagement?

Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.

LCPPage viewsClicks per viewEngaged timeAvg scroll
Good131.23 28.4 s45%
Needs improvement31.00 39.5 s35%
Poor10.00 60.4 s59%

Biggest changes vs previous 7d

MeasurePreviousNowChange
p75 FCP1.02 s1.55 s ▲ 52%
p75 CLS0.050.03 ▼ 44%
p75 INP · Processing79 ms109 ms ▲ 38%
p75 INP176 ms243 ms ▲ 38%
p75 INP · Input delay44 ms61 ms ▲ 38%
p75 INP · Presentation53 ms73 ms ▲ 38%
p75 LCP1.65 s2.17 s ▲ 31%
p75 TTFB599 ms783 ms ▲ 31%
p75 TTFB · Server wait478 ms623 ms ▲ 30%
p75 LCP · Load delay658 ms818 ms ▲ 24%
Avg engaged time41.9 s32.2 s ▼ 23%
p75 LCP · Render delay393 ms317 ms ▼ 19%