Page views
1
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
705 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 18% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
–
0% good · 0 samples
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
693 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 17% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
339 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▼ 27% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 1 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 1 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 1 | 705 ms | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1 | 3.00 | 26.8 s | 30% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg engaged time | 2.8 s | 26.8 s | ▲ 843% |
| p75 CLS | 0.04 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 52 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| Avg scroll depth | 53% | 30% | ▼ 43% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 413 ms | 253 ms | ▼ 39% |
| p75 HTML download | 70 ms | 44 ms | ▼ 37% |
| p75 TTFB | 465 ms | 339 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 LCP | 864 ms | 705 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 FCP | 834 ms | 693 ms | ▼ 17% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 400 ms | 365 ms | ▼ 9% |