Page views
2
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.76 s
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 36% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
217 ms
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 11% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 69% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.53 s
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 9% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
834 ms
50% good · 2 samples
▼ 20% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
50%
0% unhappy · 2 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 2 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 2 | 1.76 s | 217 ms | 0.02 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 1.00 | 40.5 s | 57% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 44 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 62 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · Redirect & other | 227 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 CLS | 0.06 | 0.02 | ▼ 69% |
| p75 HTML download | 191 ms | 95 ms | ▼ 50% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 1.10 s | 569 ms | ▼ 48% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 590 ms | 313 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 99 ms | 61 ms | ▼ 38% |
| Avg engaged time | 63.7 s | 40.5 s | ▼ 36% |
| p75 LCP | 2.77 s | 1.76 s | ▼ 36% |
| Avg scroll depth | 78% | 56% | ▼ 27% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.05 s | 834 ms | ▼ 20% |