Page views
4
7d
± 0% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
2.10 s
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 71% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
302 ms
33% good · 3 samples
▲ 457% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 82% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.61 s
100% good · 4 samples
▼ 48% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
883 ms
75% good · 4 samples
▼ 53% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
50%
0% unhappy · 4 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 4 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 4 | 2.10 s | 302 ms | 0.02 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 4 | 0.75 | 19.6 s | 61% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP · Processing | 24 ms | 136 ms | ▲ 457% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 16 ms | 91 ms | ▲ 457% |
| p75 INP | 54 ms | 302 ms | ▲ 457% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 14 ms | 76 ms | ▲ 457% |
| Avg engaged time | 5.9 s | 19.6 s | ▲ 235% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 47 ms | 132 ms | ▲ 180% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 29 ms | 59 ms | ▲ 101% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 2.09 s | 319 ms | ▼ 85% |
| p75 CLS | 0.11 | 0.02 | ▼ 82% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 2.78 s | 695 ms | ▼ 75% |
| p75 LCP | 7.28 s | 2.10 s | ▼ 71% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 133 ms | 51 ms | ▼ 62% |