Page views
3
7d
▲ 50% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
773 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 46% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
106 ms
100% good · 2 samples
▼ 57% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 97% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
760 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 45% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
330 ms
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 49% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 3 rated
33% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 3 | 773 ms | 106 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 3 | 2.33 | 83.2 s | 75% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.07 | 0.00 | ▼ 97% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 56 ms | 4 ms | ▼ 92% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 82 ms | 9 ms | ▼ 89% |
| Avg engaged time | 44.8 s | 83.2 s | ▲ 86% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 75 ms | 32 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 INP | 248 ms | 106 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 62 ms | 26 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 112 ms | 48 ms | ▼ 57% |
| p75 TTFB | 649 ms | 330 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 224 ms | 119 ms | ▼ 47% |
| p75 LCP | 1.44 s | 773 ms | ▼ 46% |
| p75 FCP | 1.38 s | 760 ms | ▼ 45% |