Page views
8
7d
▲ 60% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.27 s
100% good · 8 samples
▲ 66% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
141 ms
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 8% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
88% good · 8 samples
▼ 5% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.07 s
100% good · 8 samples
▲ 54% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
580 ms
100% good · 8 samples
▲ 88% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
88%
0% unhappy · 8 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 8 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 8 | 1.27 s | 141 ms | 0.04 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 8 | 1.63 | 51.8 s | 47% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 8 ms | 30 ms | ▲ 260% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 17 ms | 58 ms | ▲ 248% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 131 ms | 320 ms | ▲ 144% |
| p75 TTFB | 309 ms | 580 ms | ▲ 88% |
| p75 LCP | 765 ms | 1.27 s | ▲ 66% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 429 ms | 149 ms | ▼ 65% |
| p75 FCP | 695 ms | 1.07 s | ▲ 54% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 332 ms | 501 ms | ▲ 51% |
| Avg engaged time | 35.8 s | 51.8 s | ▲ 45% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 309 ms | 432 ms | ▲ 40% |
| Avg scroll depth | 59% | 47% | ▼ 20% |
| p75 INP | 154 ms | 141 ms | ▼ 8% |