Page views
439
7d
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.51 s
91% good · 439 samples
▲ 5% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
157 ms
82% good · 292 samples
▲ 20% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
89% good · 439 samples
▲ 22% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.21 s
90% good · 439 samples
▲ 3% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
643 ms
82% good · 439 samples
▲ 2% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
73%
5% unhappy · 439 rated
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 44% less engaged time and 81% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 13 slow page views across 1 page type.
Compare fast and slow page views →
CLS got 22% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.04. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
INP got 20% worse than the previous 7d
p75 INP is now 157 ms. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
INP over time →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.13 on the 45 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/0/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 46 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/2/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.51 s, INP 157 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 439 | 1.51 s | 157 ms | 0.04 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 399 | 1.65 | 33.3 s | 57% |
| Needs improvement | 27 | 0.81 | 25.6 s | 52% |
| Poor | 13 | 0.31 | 18.5 s | 34% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 222 ms | 271 ms | ▲ 22% |
| p75 INP | 131 ms | 157 ms | ▲ 20% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 59 ms | 71 ms | ▲ 20% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 347 ms | 396 ms | ▲ 14% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 509 ms | 558 ms | ▲ 10% |
| p75 LCP | 1.44 s | 1.51 s | ▲ 5% |
| p75 FCP | 1.17 s | 1.21 s | ▲ 3% |
| p75 TTFB | 628 ms | 643 ms | ▲ 2% |