Page views
151
7d
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.54 s
89% good · 151 samples
▲ 14% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
147 ms
88% good · 104 samples
▲ 5% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
88% good · 151 samples
▲ 66% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.35 s
87% good · 151 samples
▲ 22% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
708 ms
80% good · 151 samples
▲ 9% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
72%
9% unhappy · 151 rated
12% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
CLS got 66% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.04. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Page views whose main content took over 4 s got 60% less engaged time and 94% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s (10 slow vs 134 fast). This mixes all pages; filter to one path pattern to check it holds within a page type.
Compare fast and slow page views →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.13 on the 14 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/12/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.54 s, INP 147 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Based on 151 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 151 | 1.54 s | 147 ms | 0.04 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 134 | 1.69 | 36.6 s | 55% |
| Needs improvement | 7 | 0.57 | 18.3 s | 52% |
| Poor | 10 | 0.10 | 14.8 s | 39% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.02 | 0.04 | ▲ 66% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 27 ms | 40 ms | ▲ 47% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 333 ms | 470 ms | ▲ 41% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 433 ms | 588 ms | ▲ 36% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 43 ms | 56 ms | ▲ 30% |
| p75 FCP | 1.11 s | 1.35 s | ▲ 22% |
| Avg engaged time | 30.1 s | 34.3 s | ▲ 14% |
| p75 LCP | 1.36 s | 1.54 s | ▲ 14% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 523 ms | 575 ms | ▲ 10% |
| p75 TTFB | 649 ms | 708 ms | ▲ 9% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 410 ms | 380 ms | ▼ 7% |