ClickVitals /Shop & magazine (demo) Log in Sign up
Clear filters
Page views
208
7d
▼ 16% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.92 s
86% good · 208 samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
144 ms
83% good · 136 samples
▲ 7% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.04
90% good · 208 samples
▲ 16% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.91 s
74% good · 208 samples
± 0% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
1.02 s
62% good · 208 samples
▼ 7% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
72%
4% unhappy · 208 rated

10% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.

What to fix first

CLS got 16% worse than the previous 7d
p75 CLS is now 0.04. The Vitals tab shows when it changed and which pages it changed on.
CLS over time →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 25 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 16 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.92 s, INP 144 ms, CLS 0.04: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →

Based on 208 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).

Trend

By device

DevicePage viewsp75 LCPp75 INPp75 CLS
Desktop208 1.92 s 144 ms 0.04

Does speed cost engagement?

Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.

LCPPage viewsClicks per viewEngaged timeAvg scroll
Good1791.64 30.7 s55%
Needs improvement231.13 24.8 s54%
Poor60.50 34.2 s41%

Biggest changes vs previous 7d

MeasurePreviousNowChange
p75 TTFB · DNS47 ms35 ms ▼ 27%
Avg engaged time34.8 s30.2 s ▼ 13%
p75 HTML download129 ms116 ms ▼ 10%
p75 TTFB1.09 s1.02 s ▼ 7%
p75 TTFB · Server wait932 ms895 ms ▼ 4%
Avg scroll depth57%55% ▼ 4%