Page views
11
7d
▼ 27% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.38 s
91% good · 11 samples
▼ 6% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
141 ms
86% good · 7 samples
▲ 3% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.02
91% good · 11 samples
▼ 70% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.10 s
82% good · 11 samples
▲ 27% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
666 ms
73% good · 11 samples
▲ 40% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
82%
9% unhappy · 11 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 11 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 11 | 1.38 s | 141 ms | 0.02 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 10 | 1.70 | 34.7 s | 48% |
| Poor | 1 | 0.00 | 2.4 s | 62% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 19 ms | 57 ms | ▲ 202% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 19 ms | 49 ms | ▲ 158% |
| p75 CLS | 0.06 | 0.02 | ▼ 70% |
| p75 TTFB | 478 ms | 666 ms | ▲ 40% |
| p75 FCP | 862 ms | 1.10 s | ▲ 27% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 674 ms | 493 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 478 ms | 557 ms | ▲ 17% |
| p75 HTML download | 69 ms | 80 ms | ▲ 16% |
| Avg engaged time | 28.8 s | 31.7 s | ▲ 10% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 304 ms | 276 ms | ▼ 9% |
| Avg scroll depth | 45% | 49% | ▲ 8% |
| p75 LCP | 1.47 s | 1.38 s | ▼ 6% |