Page views
2.0k
7d
▼ 12% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.56 s
90% good · 2.0k samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
147 ms
85% good · 1.3k samples
▲ 1% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.03
89% good · 2.0k samples
▼ 16% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.31 s
87% good · 2.0k samples
± 0% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
715 ms
79% good · 2.0k samples
▼ 1% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
73%
8% unhappy · 2.0k rated
11% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Slow page loads cost you engagement
Comparing like with like (the same page type), page views whose main content took over 4 s got 50% less engaged time and 80% fewer clicks than ones that loaded in under 2.5 s. Based on 84 slow page views across 5 page types.
Compare fast and slow page views →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 206 page views where it shifted, mostly on /.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 196 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
ul.product-grid
p75 CLS is 0.12 on the 184 page views where it shifted, mostly on /search/. 1 more element that shifts is in the Vitals tab.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.56 s, INP 147 ms, CLS 0.03: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 2.0k | 1.56 s | 147 ms | 0.03 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 1.8k | 1.71 | 33.6 s | 57% |
| Needs improvement | 122 | 0.97 | 23.0 s | 57% |
| Poor | 84 | 0.35 | 16.7 s | 39% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 364 ms | 391 ms | ▲ 8% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 427 ms | 408 ms | ▼ 4% |
| Avg engaged time | 33.0 s | 32.3 s | ▼ 2% |