Page views
15
24h
▼ 62% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.25 s
93% good · 15 samples
▼ 13% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
142 ms
88% good · 8 samples
▼ 31% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.03
87% good · 15 samples
▼ 47% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.22 s
87% good · 15 samples
▼ 14% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
665 ms
87% good · 15 samples
▼ 15% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
73%
13% unhappy · 15 rated
13% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Key presses in this element respond slowly
#search_input
p75 INP is 437 ms over 3 page views, mostly on /c/headsets/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
header.site-header
p75 CLS is 0.20 on the 3 page views where it shifted, mostly on /c/headsets/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
Based on 15 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 9 | 1.20 s | 193 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 4 | 1.15 s | 94 ms | 0.08 |
| Desktop | 2 | 1.62 s | 57 ms | 0.05 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 14 | 1.21 | 53.7 s | 61% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 18.4 s | 50% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg engaged time | 29.0 s | 51.4 s | ▲ 77% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 28 ms | 14 ms | ▼ 48% |
| p75 CLS | 0.06 | 0.03 | ▼ 47% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 62 ms | 43 ms | ▼ 31% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 93 ms | 64 ms | ▼ 31% |
| p75 INP | 206 ms | 142 ms | ▼ 31% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 52 ms | 36 ms | ▼ 31% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 675 ms | 520 ms | ▼ 23% |
| p75 TTFB | 778 ms | 665 ms | ▼ 15% |
| p75 FCP | 1.42 s | 1.22 s | ▼ 14% |
| p75 LCP | 1.44 s | 1.25 s | ▼ 13% |
| p75 HTML download | 121 ms | 109 ms | ▼ 10% |