Page views
3
24h
▼ 50% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.82 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 73% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
–
0% good · 0 samples
CLS · p75
0.03
100% good · 3 samples
FCP · p75
1.81 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 84% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
977 ms
33% good · 3 samples
▲ 84% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
67%
0% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 2 | 1.95 s | – | 0.02 |
| Tablet | 1 | 3.21 s | – | 0.05 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 1.50 | 19.3 s | 84% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 1.00 | 48.3 s | 82% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 340 ms | 1.49 s | ▲ 339% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 419 ms | 846 ms | ▲ 102% |
| p75 FCP | 983 ms | 1.81 s | ▲ 84% |
| p75 TTFB | 532 ms | 977 ms | ▲ 84% |
| p75 HTML download | 105 ms | 189 ms | ▲ 80% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 1.20 s | 290 ms | ▼ 76% |
| p75 LCP | 1.63 s | 2.82 s | ▲ 73% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 48 ms | 75 ms | ▲ 58% |
| Avg engaged time | 65.7 s | 29.0 s | ▼ 56% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 44 ms | 56 ms | ▲ 29% |
| Avg scroll depth | 66% | 83% | ▲ 25% |