Page views
58
7d
▲ 5% vs previous 7d
LCP · p75
1.71 s
86% good · 58 samples
▼ 13% vs previous 7d
INP · p75
147 ms
81% good · 43 samples
▼ 27% vs previous 7d
CLS · p75
0.01
91% good · 58 samples
▼ 66% vs previous 7d
FCP · p75
1.36 s
83% good · 58 samples
▼ 20% vs previous 7d
TTFB · p75
805 ms
72% good · 58 samples
▼ 18% vs previous 7d
Happy page views
67%
7% unhappy · 58 rated
10% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Taps and clicks on this element respond slowly
div.gallery > button.next
p75 INP is 256 ms over 7 page views, mostly on /articles/14/. Most of the time goes on running the event handler.
Try: The event handler itself is slow: do less work in it, or yield (scheduler.yield / setTimeout) before the heavy part.
INP by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
div.ad-slot
p75 CLS is 0.22 on the 5 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/14/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
This element makes the page jump as it loads
#onetrust-banner-sdk
p75 CLS is 0.11 on the 4 page views where it shifted, mostly on /articles/14/.
Try: Reserve its space before it arrives: width and height (or aspect-ratio) on images and embeds, a min-height for content inserted later, and font-display with matched fallback metrics for web fonts.
CLS by element →
All three Core Web Vitals pass
p75 LCP 1.71 s, INP 147 ms, CLS 0.01: that's Google's "good" for each. Watch "Biggest changes" for regressions.
Vitals →
Based on 58 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 29 | 1.90 s | 170 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 26 | 1.59 s | 127 ms | 0.03 |
| Tablet | 3 | 2.13 s | 141 ms | 0.07 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 50 | 1.88 | 31.6 s | 52% |
| Needs improvement | 6 | 1.17 | 27.9 s | 63% |
| Poor | 2 | 0.00 | 10.5 s | 47% |
Biggest changes vs previous 7d
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.04 | 0.01 | ▼ 66% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 322 ms | 214 ms | ▼ 33% |
| p75 INP | 202 ms | 147 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 50 ms | 37 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 61 ms | 44 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 91 ms | 66 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 57 ms | 69 ms | ▲ 22% |
| p75 FCP | 1.71 s | 1.36 s | ▼ 20% |
| p75 TTFB | 980 ms | 805 ms | ▼ 18% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 781 ms | 659 ms | ▼ 16% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 532 ms | 611 ms | ▲ 15% |
| p75 LCP | 1.97 s | 1.71 s | ▼ 13% |