Page views
7
24h
▼ 42% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.23 s
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 47% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
176 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▲ 12% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
716 ms
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 23% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
397 ms
100% good · 7 samples
▼ 23% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
86%
0% unhappy · 7 rated
14% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 7 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 4 | 838 ms | 148 ms | 0.00 |
| Mobile | 2 | 869 ms | 257 ms | 0.04 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.58 s | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 7 | 1.57 | 17.7 s | 73% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 66 ms | 340 ms | ▲ 417% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 20 ms | 38 ms | ▲ 87% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 300 ms | 136 ms | ▼ 55% |
| p75 LCP | 2.33 s | 1.23 s | ▼ 47% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 486 ms | 318 ms | ▼ 35% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 1.58 s | 1.09 s | ▼ 31% |
| Avg scroll depth | 56% | 73% | ▲ 29% |
| p75 FCP | 933 ms | 716 ms | ▼ 23% |
| p75 TTFB | 516 ms | 397 ms | ▼ 23% |
| Avg engaged time | 22.9 s | 17.7 s | ▼ 22% |
| p75 HTML download | 86 ms | 99 ms | ▲ 15% |
| p75 INP | 158 ms | 176 ms | ▲ 12% |