Page views
7
24h
▼ 71% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.23 s
71% good · 7 samples
▲ 41% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
232 ms
50% good · 4 samples
▲ 11% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.09
86% good · 7 samples
FCP · p75
1.55 s
100% good · 7 samples
▲ 28% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
719 ms
86% good · 7 samples
▲ 5% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
29%
14% unhappy · 7 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 7 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet | 3 | 2.75 s | 215 ms | 0.05 |
| Mobile | 2 | 1.21 s | 230 ms | 0.06 |
| Desktop | 2 | 2.42 s | 83 ms | 0.12 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 5 | 1.00 | 32.4 s | 40% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 2.00 | 20.5 s | 100% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 13.9 s | 13% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load time | 688 ms | 1.12 s | ▲ 63% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 52 ms | 20 ms | ▼ 62% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 63 ms | 25 ms | ▼ 59% |
| p75 LCP | 1.58 s | 2.23 s | ▲ 41% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 222 ms | 157 ms | ▼ 29% |
| p75 FCP | 1.22 s | 1.55 s | ▲ 28% |
| Avg scroll depth | 61% | 45% | ▼ 26% |
| p75 HTML download | 99 ms | 75 ms | ▼ 24% |
| Avg engaged time | 32.4 s | 28.0 s | ▼ 13% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 94 ms | 104 ms | ▲ 11% |
| p75 INP | 208 ms | 232 ms | ▲ 11% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 594 ms | 656 ms | ▲ 10% |