Page views
3
24h
▼ 40% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.00 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 78% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
762 ms
0% good · 2 samples
▲ 464% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.06
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 42% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.97 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 166% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
1.11 s
67% good · 3 samples
▲ 170% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
33%
67% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 3 | 2.00 s | 762 ms | 0.06 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 2 | 0.00 | 59.3 s | 56% |
| Needs improvement | 1 | 0.00 | 11.9 s | 72% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 INP | 135 ms | 762 ms | ▲ 464% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 34 ms | 190 ms | ▲ 464% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 40 ms | 229 ms | ▲ 464% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 61 ms | 343 ms | ▲ 464% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 374 ms | 1.05 s | ▲ 182% |
| p75 TTFB | 410 ms | 1.11 s | ▲ 170% |
| p75 FCP | 741 ms | 1.97 s | ▲ 166% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 368 ms | 895 ms | ▲ 143% |
| p75 HTML download | 94 ms | 171 ms | ▲ 82% |
| p75 LCP | 1.12 s | 2.00 s | ▲ 78% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 29 ms | 47 ms | ▲ 63% |
| p75 CLS | 0.11 | 0.06 | ▼ 42% |