Page views
3
24h
▼ 84% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
2.03 s
100% good · 3 samples
▲ 58% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
194 ms
100% good · 1 samples
▲ 4% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 3 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
2.03 s
33% good · 3 samples
▲ 104% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
1.18 s
33% good · 3 samples
▲ 120% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
100%
0% unhappy · 3 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 3 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 2 | 2.08 s | 194 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 1 | 1.12 s | – | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 3 | 1.67 | 51.7 s | 64% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 68 ms | 851 ms | ▲ 1155% |
| p75 TTFB | 536 ms | 1.18 s | ▲ 120% |
| p75 FCP | 993 ms | 2.03 s | ▲ 104% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 504 ms | 1.02 s | ▲ 103% |
| p75 CLS | 0.03 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP | 1.29 s | 2.03 s | ▲ 58% |
| Avg engaged time | 38.7 s | 51.7 s | ▲ 34% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 47 ms | 58 ms | ▲ 23% |
| p75 HTML download | 98 ms | 83 ms | ▼ 15% |
| Avg scroll depth | 61% | 64% | ▲ 5% |