Page views
6
24h
▼ 50% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
854 ms
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 60% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
423 ms
40% good · 5 samples
▲ 87% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.02
100% good · 6 samples
▲ 413% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
837 ms
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 61% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
412 ms
100% good · 6 samples
▼ 65% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
50%
17% unhappy · 6 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 6 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 4 | 674 ms | 511 ms | 0.02 |
| Desktop | 2 | 816 ms | 81 ms | 0.02 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 6 | 1.33 | 40.0 s | 60% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.00 | 0.02 | ▲ 413% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 68 ms | 127 ms | ▲ 87% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 102 ms | 190 ms | ▲ 87% |
| p75 INP | 226 ms | 423 ms | ▲ 87% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 56 ms | 106 ms | ▲ 87% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 938 ms | 322 ms | ▼ 66% |
| p75 TTFB | 1.19 s | 412 ms | ▼ 65% |
| p75 FCP | 2.16 s | 837 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 LCP | 2.15 s | 854 ms | ▼ 60% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 78 ms | 36 ms | ▼ 54% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 594 ms | 297 ms | ▼ 50% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 187 ms | 257 ms | ▲ 37% |