Page views
5
24h
▼ 86% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.49 s
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 4% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
210 ms
75% good · 4 samples
▼ 6% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.22
60% good · 5 samples
▲ 208% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.46 s
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 5% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
713 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 16% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
40%
40% unhappy · 5 rated
20% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 5 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 4 | 1.49 s | 324 ms | 0.06 |
| Tablet | 1 | 1.49 s | 52 ms | 0.22 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 5 | 1.80 | 54.6 s | 48% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.07 | 0.22 | ▲ 208% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 26 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 48 ms | 88 ms | ▲ 82% |
| Avg engaged time | 39.7 s | 54.6 s | ▲ 37% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 48 ms | 66 ms | ▲ 36% |
| p75 TTFB | 847 ms | 713 ms | ▼ 16% |
| Avg scroll depth | 52% | 48% | ▼ 9% |
| p75 INP | 224 ms | 210 ms | ▼ 6% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 748 ms | 712 ms | ▼ 5% |
| p75 FCP | 1.53 s | 1.46 s | ▼ 5% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 681 ms | 713 ms | ▲ 5% |
| p75 LCP | 1.56 s | 1.49 s | ▼ 4% |