Page views
5
24h
▼ 58% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
828 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 50% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
249 ms
33% good · 3 samples
▼ 61% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
689 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 56% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
427 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 49% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
40%
20% unhappy · 5 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 5 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 3 | 751 ms | 263 ms | 0.00 |
| Mobile | 2 | 3.63 s | 50 ms | 0.07 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 4 | 2.25 | 12.7 s | 48% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 15.7 s | 47% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.11 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 233 ms | 57 ms | ▼ 76% |
| Avg engaged time | 53.1 s | 13.3 s | ▼ 75% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 47 ms | 17 ms | ▼ 64% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 192 ms | 75 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 INP | 639 ms | 249 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 160 ms | 62 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 288 ms | 112 ms | ▼ 61% |
| p75 FCP | 1.56 s | 689 ms | ▼ 56% |
| p75 LCP | 1.66 s | 828 ms | ▼ 50% |
| p75 TTFB | 842 ms | 427 ms | ▼ 49% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 882 ms | 476 ms | ▼ 46% |