Page views
5
24h
▼ 44% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
470 ms
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 71% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
206 ms
67% good · 3 samples
▼ 28% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
100% good · 5 samples
FCP · p75
467 ms
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 64% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
171 ms
100% good · 5 samples
▼ 76% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
80%
0% unhappy · 5 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 5 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 3 | 406 ms | 165 ms | 0.00 |
| Mobile | 2 | 890 ms | 212 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 5 | 1.20 | 39.5 s | 74% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 1.08 s | 51 ms | ▼ 95% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 73 ms | 11 ms | ▼ 85% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 919 ms | 209 ms | ▼ 77% |
| p75 TTFB | 699 ms | 171 ms | ▼ 76% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 699 ms | 171 ms | ▼ 76% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 64 ms | 17 ms | ▼ 74% |
| p75 LCP | 1.60 s | 470 ms | ▼ 71% |
| p75 FCP | 1.28 s | 467 ms | ▼ 64% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 322 ms | 450 ms | ▲ 40% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 86 ms | 62 ms | ▼ 28% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 129 ms | 93 ms | ▼ 28% |
| p75 INP | 287 ms | 206 ms | ▼ 28% |