Page views
8
24h
▼ 65% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.84 s
100% good · 8 samples
▼ 3% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
208 ms
75% good · 4 samples
▼ 23% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.00
88% good · 8 samples
▼ 100% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
1.32 s
75% good · 8 samples
▲ 5% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
664 ms
75% good · 8 samples
▼ 15% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
75%
13% unhappy · 8 rated
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 8 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 5 | 1.94 s | 160 ms | 0.00 |
| Desktop | 2 | 910 ms | 110 ms | 0.00 |
| Tablet | 1 | 773 ms | 250 ms | 0.00 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 8 | 1.88 | 34.6 s | 50% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 69 ms | 569 ms | ▲ 727% |
| p75 CLS | 0.07 | 0.00 | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 407 ms | 260 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 746 ms | 499 ms | ▼ 33% |
| p75 HTML download | 109 ms | 80 ms | ▼ 27% |
| p75 INP · Processing | 122 ms | 94 ms | ▼ 23% |
| p75 INP | 271 ms | 208 ms | ▼ 23% |
| p75 INP · Input delay | 68 ms | 52 ms | ▼ 23% |
| p75 INP · Presentation | 81 ms | 62 ms | ▼ 23% |
| Avg scroll depth | 63% | 50% | ▼ 21% |
| p75 TTFB | 778 ms | 664 ms | ▼ 15% |
| p75 FCP | 1.26 s | 1.32 s | ▲ 5% |