Page views
5
24h
▼ 97% vs previous 24h
LCP · p75
1.86 s
80% good · 5 samples
▲ 8% vs previous 24h
INP · p75
232 ms
0% good · 2 samples
▲ 7% vs previous 24h
CLS · p75
0.19
60% good · 5 samples
▲ 322% vs previous 24h
FCP · p75
925 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 31% vs previous 24h
TTFB · p75
503 ms
80% good · 5 samples
▼ 32% vs previous 24h
Happy page views
0%
20% unhappy · 5 rated
20% of these page views were in-app (soft) navigations. Those report INP and CLS, but browsers only measure LCP, FCP and TTFB on full page loads, so those three cover fewer page views.
What to fix first
Nothing stands out for these filters: no page type, element or script has enough slow page views to call out.
Based on 5 page views. Findings need at least 5 measured page views each, so more show up as traffic grows (try the 30d range).
Trend
By device
| Device | Page views | p75 LCP | p75 INP | p75 CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop | 3 | 2.84 s | 212 ms | 0.10 |
| Mobile | 2 | 1.51 s | 238 ms | 0.15 |
Does speed cost engagement?
Page views grouped by their own LCP. If slower pages get fewer clicks and less reading, that's the cost of slowness.
| LCP | Page views | Clicks per view | Engaged time | Avg scroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 4 | 2.50 | 24.0 s | 53% |
| Poor | 1 | 1.00 | 7.5 s | 28% |
Biggest changes vs previous 24h
| Measure | Previous | Now | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| p75 CLS | 0.05 | 0.19 | ▲ 322% |
| p75 LCP · Render delay | 187 ms | 414 ms | ▲ 121% |
| p75 TTFB · DNS | 32 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · Connect | 54 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 TTFB · TLS | 60 ms | 0 ms | ▼ 100% |
| p75 LCP · Load delay | 510 ms | 324 ms | ▼ 36% |
| p75 TTFB | 741 ms | 503 ms | ▼ 32% |
| p75 FCP | 1.34 s | 925 ms | ▼ 31% |
| Avg engaged time | 28.9 s | 20.7 s | ▼ 28% |
| p75 LCP · Load time | 624 ms | 740 ms | ▲ 19% |
| p75 TTFB · Server wait | 595 ms | 503 ms | ▼ 15% |
| Avg scroll depth | 54% | 48% | ▼ 12% |